Archived entries for

how to kiss.

if…

you were a (sexually) experienced 13-year-old giving your inexperienced 13-year-old friend tips on how to kiss his/her first boy/girl, what would you say?

Evolution, Shmevolution.

With a single swift kick to God’s nuts, Florida just starting requiring teachers to lie (see this). Yes, our Lord Jesus Christ is sprawled on the floor groaning tonight as Florida has enacted a policy requiring teachers to teach evolution (hereinafter “big fucking lie”) to our children.

I’ve had enough. I’m moving my family to Ave Maria, where the biologists and the gays and the abortionists can’t shit on my faith. And I’ll have all the kids I can because the wife can’t get a hold of the contraceptives; no condom’s going to shit on my marriage. No sir.

Sic on Me

By the way,

yes, I am aware that I’m not supposed to put quotation marks around text that has been offset with smaller margins. I know this, but I choose to take risks and disregard the rules. I am a risktaker.

I’m also aware that you might argue that risktaker is actually two words. It’s not. It’s one. Who is my source? I am. It’s one.

Finally, I know that I was technically incorrect where I wrote “[t]o explain,” at the beginning of the second paragraph in quotation marks. That should have not been offset with the rest of the text. I know this. But like I said, I’m a risktaker today. I’m taking risks and being bold and living dangerously.

It also should be noted that in the last sentence that I wrote, I should not have said “and” twice. I know this, but I chose to disregard the rules for stylistic effect.

Today’s Good News: Planet Swallowing Black Holes …

This from Gail Collinslatest Op-Ed in The New York Times:

“The vast majority of the scientific community believes that the Large Hadron will not lead to the destruction of all life as we know it. Or at least as Greg Landsberg, a physicist from Brown University, was quoted as saying, the chances are “totally minuscule.”

To explain, “[t]he Large Hadron, you may remember, is the 17-mile-long particle accelerator being built near Geneva. Once it’s up and running, its designers believe it will take particle physics research to a whole new level. Its critics think it may create a black hole that will swallow up the universe. This is what is known as a wide range of possibilities.”

I’ve been trying to stay as positive as possible lately. So, a few points:

(1) If the universe was, in fact, swallowed in a black hole, I could quit looking for a job and start livin’ !

(2) If the universe was so swallowed, we’d probably never even know it’d happened at all

(3) If the universe ceased to exist, it’d sort of render moot our whole discussion on genital shaving

(4) On the bad side of things, it’d mean that I for sure would never get to see Khaled in concert

Today’s Good News: Planet Swallowing Black Holes …

This from Gail Collinslatest Op-Ed in The New York Times:

“The vast majority of the scientific community believes that the Large Hadron will not lead to the destruction of all life as we know it. Or at least as Greg Landsberg, a physicist from Brown University, was quoted as saying, the chances are “totally minuscule.”

To explain, “[t]he Large Hadron, you may remember, is the 17-mile-long particle accelerator being built near Geneva. Once it’s up and running, its designers believe it will take particle physics research to a whole new level. Its critics think it may create a black hole that will swallow up the universe. This is what is known as a wide range of possibilities.”

I’ve been trying to stay as positive as possible lately. So, a few points:

(1) If the universe was, in fact, swallowed in a black hole, I could quit looking for a job and start livin’ !

(2) If the universe was so swallowed, we’d probably never even know it’d happened at all

(3) If the universe ceased to exist, it’d sort of render moot our whole discussion on genital shaving

(4) On the bad side of things, it’d mean that I for sure would never get to see Khaled in concert